Studio projects Wednesday May 09 2012 12:48 pm
AIGA / Philadelphia Feedback
I thought I would try to collect my thoughts about the AIGA / Philadelphia Feedback portfolio review held last night at Moore College of Art. I’ll rewrite this over the next couple of days. I’ll correct the typos and provide more clarity. But I wanted to get it started for anyone that might come to it.
A note to start with. I don’t think students should be worrying about if the intended target consumer will buy into the piece. It is whether a design studio, advertising agency, etc. will buy into it as a piece representing the students potential to contribute. That is what you are selling. Not the product of your piece, but your ability to present that product in a way that sells your design, illustration, writing skills. The rest will follow.
. . .
I talked to 10 or 11 students and the quality of the work covered the full range of possibilities.
I didn’t see a lot of projects where the project itself caught my attention. Movie posters were for the standard movies. Bookcovers were for the standard books. Wine labels. Logos for small startups. Sitting here this morning I can only remember two projects (lyric posters and an exercising app that lifted the energy of the music as you worked out) that the student seemed to invent that was really, really interesting and new, but both of the solutions had uninspired design which was a real shame. I think they both could have been projects where that one project would have made me want to hire you. It is hard to imagine how many of the projects come from teachers that say “Design a wine label.” For the money they get to teach, they can come up with better projects than I saw, but then I only saw a few portfolios. They all seemed strangely normal in a world where change is happening at breakneck speed. For instance, instead of just designing a wine label or a package that makes a crappy bottle of wine cost twice as much, design a bottle that is a matchmaker, the person (thing?) that brings the two people that are sharing it together—the eHarmony of wine labels. Maybe a label that explains all of the subtle tastes that I should be tasting as I drink it, so that after the wine, I’m a better judge of wines. I hope that made sense as I think it is an interesting point.
1. This is a bit self serving, but write and design and mail a THANK YOU through the United States Post Office to everyone who took time away from work or families or TV to spend an evening looking at your student work. I mean DESIGN a thank you. Not an email. Something that took a few minutes out of your life. One of the best instances I spoke of this last night was suggesting that a student take a criticism I made of a piece they thought was helpful and use that as the basis for the design of the thank you. It would take them about 3 minutes to do it. What did I say that was important to you. Include that criticism in some way in the thank you so they will essentially know who it came from. Make the reviewer remember you by your thank you. THEN MAIL IT. DO IT QUICKLY. In my opinion, if you wait two weeks, you might as well not do it. You could do those well and you’d have another page in your portfolio. You should thank everyone (same concrete way and not just an email) that ever gives you any of their time. Everytime. Everytime. Everytime. For the rest of your life. I am amazed at how much effort I can go to. I just did a project for the benefit of 9 graduate students and did not get one hint that anyone cared for the 90 minutes effort it took on my part.
2. I started my interviews last night with “What do you want to be?” I was surprised how many students couldn’t articulate that in one or two sentences. Why are you studying design or illustration or typography? Then to me your portfolio should be a body of work that will jump start you down that path. And that first piece in the portfolio should be the dessert of what should be a good visual meal.
3. Boring design work. One way I tried to makes sense of what unexpired design started with, “If the client was willing to approve this layout, how long do you think it would take me to design the piece.” In most instances, no more than 5 minutes a page to pour in some type, grab an existing image and crop it and position it in a nice way. Done. 5 minutes. You have to do work that will make me, a professional designer, work hard to duplicate or equal your effort.
Add to this any design where you use existing photography in any kind of dominant way without inflecting some of your own effort into it. Taking a photo from some magazine, cropping it into a rectangle, and gluing it down is a crime against design. NEVER USE ANYONE ELSE’S CREATIVE WORK AS YOUR OWN. Crop it in an important way. Intrude into it. Carve it. Something. Same is true for typography.
4. The jugsaw puzzle syndrome. Personally I hate it when the various visual elements (illustration, piece of type, or whatever) has an imaginary fence around it that keeps anything else from intruding into or onto it. Photos on one side of the gutter—typography on the other side of the gutter. Boring. It is like the world is a two-dimensional space and the most anything can do is bump against something else (and even then most of the things have a little white border around them). Why can’t a descender descend more into the next line and then maybe split the word under it like a knife cutting through a block of cheese. One of the great things about computers is that you can layer. Do that. If you don’t there should be a really good reason why you didn’t. Intrude. Interrupt. Crowd. You have a lot of control over what stands out first by what overlaps something else. Overlap provides power and it can even happen to something small.
5. Business cards. Have them and give them out recklessly. I’m a letterpress printer and I HATE 8 POINT TYPE ON A BUSINESS CARD. Honestly, if you want me to write you an email so I can offer you a $40,000 a year job, don’t you think it should be easy for me to read your email address. My favorite business card I’ve ever seen was a guy’s name on the front and his email address on the back. No address. No phone number. He was the president of one the largest advertising agencies in the world. Name and email were the same size. About 18 point. The card was red and if you were in the business you knew exactly what agency (Ogilvy) he worked for. How small can I make the type? BORING. Your business card is a BILLBOARD. Act like it. And it wouldn’t hurt if you acted like you cared that I had to look through the data on it while trying to dial it on a cellphone standing out in bright sunlight.
6. The order of the portfolio is critical. I’m not sure I saw anyone that actually had what I thought was their best work first (of course, maybe I don’t know how to like the right pieces). Who do you want to be and the piece says that the absolute best should be your first piece. Your second best piece should be the last piece in your portfolio. You want to start on a good note and end on a good note. Third best piece should be the second piece in your portfolio. The ones in between the second and last can likely be in most any order, but I would consider how you sequence the work. How do they tell a narrative story about who you want to be? You don’t have to group all of your editorial work together and then all of your packaging. They can move around. You can bounce back and forth between edgy and subdued work, large scale and small scale.
7. Slim down the portfolio. People, especially with iPads, tended to show too much work. Honestly, 5 killer pieces could be enough. My guess is that most people are hired on only 1 or 2 pieces, so clearly those must be good projects. You have to make sure the others don’t bring down the good ones. Don’t pad your portfolio with projects that don’t matter. Maybe one or two details and move on. May people that wanted to show that an idea had legs just added 4 applications that were then too small to really see. You actually need to show ‘legs’ with a project that shows them well, and not just an idea with alternative applications. Don’t include work just because you have a lot of time invested in it. For the most part I don’t care where you put in your time. If you can do good work quickly, more power to you. Actually, good work should look easy, inevitable, almost as if, “What else could I have done?”
It is worth throwing in here how hard it is to take a piece you’ve spent a month on and then not put it in your portfolio. But if it isn’t helping to tell your story well, you have to be a surgeon and cut it out.
And if you need to photograph the project (i.e. package design) it needs to be a good photograph. Use good lighting. I like them with a bit of a shadow. Look at our books in our portfolio. And think about if you can crop off part of the thing. You don’t necessarily need to show the neck of a wine bottle. You can make it a lot larger to show off your label if you bleed it off the top. And cutting off the top of the bottle shows some design while showing it all likely doesn’t.
8. Overall piece’s concept. What is the piece about? How have you helped me figure it out. There was a lot of visually interesting work, but I just couldn’t quickly figure out how to read it. Keep in mind that if you have large type I’m going to read that first. Then my eye is at the end of those words. How do you get me to look at the next important thing? What elements were important to your story? How do you help me navigate through the piece? This often happened on posters and posters are quick pieces often viewed from some distance. It was like reading a short story where the author took all of the sentences and put them in a different order. Where do I start? Where next? Scale. Color. Position. Juxtaposition. If you want me to see and connect various elements in the piece you are going to have to put up some road signs.
9. Centering or designing a number of different projects with the same layout. There were a bunch of logos with the name of the company centered under it and they were from a lot of different schools. Keep in mind I don’t need you if all I’m going to do is center them one over the other. That will take me 2 seconds. Take me somewhere else. Marry the logo and the company name together. Concern yourself with how they would work separately. Make the pieces fit together in a surprising way. And get up every morning and say to your self, “Don’t center if you can avoid it.”
10. I also didn’t see many (I may not have seen any) complex design problems that seem like the kinds of problems normal businesses have. Little that seemed like it would take more than 2 or 3 weeks of class. I need a logo, then I need that logo applied to some places (personally I would design a logo where you could use variations of it and still identify the company) like the store front, letterhead, 3 kinds of business cards (for business meetings versus those that would sit out for the general public to pick up), and ad, a brochure, a mailing piece, an ipad. Now do all of that, but have a cohesive concept of the company and have every one of those pieces add to that story. “We sell lots of cute things.” The logo should say that. The letterhead should say that. An ad should say (show) that? And I could go on and on about that. Not just the name of the company, but “We sell lots of cute things.”
Some thoughts for AIGA for next year.
Do the breakout sessions in the middle of the semester and try to help people get juiced about doing a killer portfolio before they get to the Feedback. I would have loved to have a chance to talk to several of the students two months ago. Schools might have seniors do a test run at the portfolio and invite five people to review them. Get that information BEFORE you do you portfolio.
How about an early portfolio review where they only show five pieces?
When students sign up they need to also list their schools.
15 minutes is too short.
Why not start the interviews at 5:00. Reviewers can get involved as they get there?













